Subject	91 (n/m)
Posted by	Ed1 on October 20, 2006 at 7:30 PM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? posted by turbov6er on October 20, 2006 at 12:58 AM
Message
Follow Ups	1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? - turbov6er 00:58:25 10/20/06 ummm ...BUY THE 1991 (n/m) - SuparexTT 01:02:35 10/20/06 Based on just the info given i'd say the '91 but... - timathiscott 01:07:38 10/20/06 run a carfax too but the 91 sounds better - MOZZ 01:19:07 10/20/06 So true and very annoying. (n/m) - SuparexTT 01:23:16 10/20/06 Get the 91.. (n/m) - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 01:57:33 10/20/06 Re: 1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? (n/m) - turbov6er 01:58:00 10/20/06 Re: Re: 1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? - turbov6er 01:59:37 10/20/06 Re: Re: Re: 1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? (n/m) - turbov6er 02:01:32 10/20/06 Just click on the post that you would like to reply to - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 02:02:33 10/20/06 Re: Re: Re: 1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? - turbov6er 02:05:18 10/20/06 Re: Re: Re: Re: 1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? - turbov6er 02:07:56 10/20/06 the drivetrain is the same basically from 91-93' - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 02:13:00 10/20/06 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? - turbov6er 02:13:18 10/20/06 The brake calipers were changed to cast iron in 92' later. - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 02:26:41 10/20/06 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 1991 or 1993 tt 300???????????? - turbov6er 02:16:43 10/20/06 yes.. - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 02:18:46 10/20/06 If you don't buy the 91 I certainly will. I noticed you are - Seafordguy 06:57:25 10/20/06 Yo turbov6er!!! - timathiscott 02:37:39 10/20/06 A 91 TT with 32K miles for $10,000? If in very good - 240Z FeO2 02:38:01 10/20/06 That's a steal if it's in good shape. (n/m) - BummedOutMonkey 08:19:15 10/20/06 2nd. If a deal sounds too good to be ture, it USUALLY is... - Aqualung 08:37:01 10/20/06 buy buy buy... - I.Z.U.8.1.B.4 (SC) 10:16:05 10/20/06 all things being equal buy the 91 - LJZTT 15:47:45 10/20/06 91 (n/m) - Ed1 19:30:40 10/20/06 Conzult & look underneath for oily turbo housings. (n/m) - teahead-Seattle 20:17:45 10/20/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.